Changing Identity Background paper for roundtable at the AEA Meetings Boston
نویسندگان
چکیده
Homo Economicus has progressed from an atomistic and self-interested individual in standard economics to a socially embedded agent in modern economics who is endowed with a particular social identity or with specific preferences for the latter. While this vision makes the economic agent, more realistic, its representation by adding entries in an agent’s utility function poses problems. The distinction between the agent’s own preferences and those that society imposes on the agent becomes both blurred, and difficult to make. In order to separate these two facets of preferences, we explore the idea of an agent’s personal identity of which his social identity is one aspect. To consider personal identity means endowing the economic agent with the capacity to change, in particular, in the social space. This greatly complicates the problem of making welfare judgements since it is difficult to define a welfare improvement in the future. We next present a model in which the evolution of peoples’ identities is stochastic. This can explain the appearance of individuals who seem to defy social convention. Our model shows how personal identity changes. We can find a social equilibrium only if personal identity matters little. But this suggests, paradoxically, that for individuals to have well-established identities, society must be one which is is not in equilibrium, but one which will continue to change and in which both the social groups and the individuals are constantly being modified.
منابع مشابه
Changing Patterns of Technological Knowledge Production and the Organizational Adaptations Inside the Firms
Paper prepared for the session " Technology and Institutions Co-evolving " at the AEA meeting, Boston, January 2006-2
متن کاملHigher-Order Perturbation Solutions to Dynamic, Discrete-Time Rational Expectations Models
We present an algorithm and software routines for computing nthorder Taylor series approximate solutions to dynamic, discrete-time rational expectations models around a nonstochastic steady state. The primary advantage of higher-order (as opposed to firstor secondorder) approximations is that they are valid not just locally, but often globally (i.e., over nonlocal, possibly very large compact s...
متن کاملPlace Based Policies and Unemployment
* We thank seminar participants at Berkeley and the AEA meetings in San Diego for useful comments and Attila Sandor Lindner for excellent research assistance.
متن کاملSchool choice: an experimental study
We present an experimental study of three school choice mechanisms. The Boston mechanism is influential in practice, while the two alternative mechanisms, the Gale-Shapley and Top Trading Cycles mechanisms, have superior theoretical properties in terms of incentives and efficiency. Consistent with theory, this study indicates a high preference manipulation rate under the Boston mechanism. As a ...
متن کاملThe International Diversification Puzzle Is Not as Bad as You Think
In simple one-good international macro models, the presence of non-diversifiable labor income risk means that country portfolios should be heavily biased toward foreign assets. The fact that the opposite pattern of diversification is observed empirically constitutes the international diversification puzzle. We embed a portfolio choice decision in a frictionless two-country, two-good version of ...
متن کامل